Login / Register Submit Your Article
cover
Article Menu

Journal Browser
Vol. 3 (2025)
Vol. 2 (2024)
Vol. 1 (2023)
Indexing and Partners

Google scholar

Crossref

cardiovascular anti-inflammatory infection polymers mucoadhesion mucosa Epithelial Diffusion Buccal binding interactions anticancer antibiotic mechanism of action pyrrolizine open appendectomy laparoscopy surgical site infection elderly split-thickness skin conventional therapy
Open Access Communication

Artificial intelligence in healthcare

by Jakub Dominik 1,*
1
Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 37, 150 00 Praha 5, Czechia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
IJCMR  2025 3(2):51; https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr3020001
Received: 29 December 2024 / Accepted: 15 February 2025 / Published Online: 15 February 2025
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

In recent years, enhanced artificial intelligence algorithms and more access to training data have enabled artificial intelligence to augment or supplant certain functions of physicians. Nonetheless, the interest of diverse stakeholders in the application of artificial intelligence in medicine has not resulted in extensive acceptance. Numerous experts have indicated that a primary cause for the limited adoption is the lack of openness surrounding certain artificial intelligence algorithms, particularly black-box algorithms. Clinical medicine, particularly evidence-based practice, depends on transparency in decision-making. If there is no medically explicable artificial intelligence and the physician cannot adequately elucidate the decision-making process, the patient's trust in them will diminish. To resolve the transparency concern associated with specific artificial intelligence models, explainable artificial intelligence has arisen.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; healthcare; algorithms; Clinical medicine;
Copyright: © 2025 by Dominik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Dominik, J. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research, 2025, 3, 51. doi:10.61466/ijcmr3020001
AMA Style
Dominik J. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research; 2025, 3(2):51. doi:10.61466/ijcmr3020001
Chicago/Turabian Style
Dominik, Jakub 2025. "Artificial intelligence in healthcare" International Journal of Clinical Medical Research 3, no.2:51. doi:10.61466/ijcmr3020001

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Yoon, C.H., Torrance, R., and Scheinerman, N., Machine learning in medicine: should the pursuit of enhanced interpretability be abandoned? Journal of Medical Ethics, 2022. 48(9): p. 581-585.
  2. Sadeghi, Z., Alizadehsani, R., Cifci, M.A., et al., A review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in healthcare. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2024. 118: p. 109370.
  3. Ghassemi, M., Oakden-Rayner, L., and Beam, A.L., The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health, 2021. 3(11): p. e745-e750.
  4. Amann, J., Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., et al., Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2020. 20(1): p. 310.
  5. Kundu, S., AI in medicine must be explainable. Nature Medicine, 2021. 27(8): p. 1328-1328.
  6. Reddy, S., Fox, J., and Purohit, M.P., Artificial intelligence-enabled healthcare delivery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2019. 112(1): p. 22-28.
  7. Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., et al., Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 2024. 16(1): p. 45-74.
  8. Vellido, A., Societal Issues Concerning the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Kidney Diseases, 2018. 5(1): p. 11-17.
  9. Kelly, C.J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., et al., Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 2019. 17(1): p. 195.
  10. Grzybowski, A., Jin, K., and Wu, H., Challenges of artificial intelligence in medicine and dermatology. Clinics in Dermatology, 2024. 42(3): p. 210-215.
  11. Ong, J.C.L., Seng, B.J.J., Law, J.Z.F., et al., Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and other large language models for social determinants of health: Current state and future directions. Cell Reports Medicine, 2024. 5(1).
  12. Cutillo, C.M., Sharma, K.R., Foschini, L., et al., Machine intelligence in healthcare—perspectives on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency. npj Digital Medicine, 2020. 3(1): p. 47.
  13. Desai, A.N., Artificial Intelligence: Promise, Pitfalls, and Perspective. JAMA, 2020. 323(24): p. 2448-2449.