Journal Browser
Open Access Journal Article

Wound complications frequency in minor technique gastrectomy compared to open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

by A. Sundaresan 1
1
Research Associate, CAS in Marine Biology, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608502, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
IJCMR  2023, 12; 1(3), 12; https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030012
Received: 12 August 2023 / Accepted: 1 October 2023 / Published Online: 10 October 2023

Abstract

Background:

A meta-analysis investigation was executed to measure the wound complications (WCs) frequency in minor technique gastrectomy (MTG) compared to open gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer (GC).

Methods:

A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 2078 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 17 chosen investigations enclosed 12746 individuals with GC were in the chosen investigations' starting point, 3052 of them were utilizing robotic gastrectomy (RG), 6603 of them were utilizing laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and 3091 were utilizing OG. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to compute the value of the WCs frequency in MTG compared to OG for GC by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model.

Results:

No significant difference was found in surgical site wound infection (SSWI) between RG and OG (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.89-2.35, p=0.13), LG and OG (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47-1.18, p=0.21), and RG and LG (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.72-1.60, p=0.73) in individuals with GC.

Conclusions:

No significant difference was found in SSWI between RG, OG, and LG in individuals with GC. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low number of nominated in the meta-analysis and the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.


Copyright: © 2023 by Sundaresan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Sundaresan, A. Wound complications frequency in minor technique gastrectomy compared to open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research, 2023, 1, 12. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030012
AMA Style
Sundaresan A. Wound complications frequency in minor technique gastrectomy compared to open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research; 2023, 1(3):12. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030012
Chicago/Turabian Style
Sundaresan, A. 2023. "Wound complications frequency in minor technique gastrectomy compared to open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis" International Journal of Clinical Medical Research 1, no.3:12. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030012

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Kitano, S., Y. Iso, M. Moriyama, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 4(2): p. 146-148 (1994).
  2. Cadière, M., Ph. D, Guy-Bernard, M. Himpens, Jacques, O. Germay, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World journal of surgery 25: p. 1467-1477 (2001).
  3. Pigazzi, A., J. Ellenhorn, G. Ballantyne, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 20: p. 1521-1525 (2006).
  4. Song, J., S.J. Oh, W.H. Kang, et al. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Annals of surgery 249(6): p. 927-932 (2009).
  5. Baik, S.H., H.Y. Kwon, J.S. Kim, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Annals of surgical oncology 16: p. 1480-1487 (2009).
  6. Stroup, D.F., J.A. Berlin, S.C. Morton, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Jama 283(15): p. 2008-2012 (2000).
  7. Liberati, A., D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology 62(10): p. e1-e34 (2009).
  8. Gupta, S., G. Rout, A.H. Patel, et al. Efficacy of generic oral directly acting agents in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Journal of viral hepatitis 25(7): p. 771-778 (2018).
  9. Sheikhbahaei, S., T.J. Trahan, J. Xiao, et al. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for evaluation of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The oncologist 21(8): p. 931-939 (2016).
  10. Higgins, J.P., S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj 327(7414): p. 557-560 (2003).
  11. Caruso, S., A. Patriti, D. Marrelli, et al. Open vs robot‐assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case‐control study. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 7(4): p. 452-458 (2011).
  12. Huang, K.-H., Y.-T. Lan, W.-L. Fang, et al. Initial experience of robotic gastrectomy and comparison with open and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 16: p. 1303-1310 (2012).
  13. Kim, K., J. An, H. Kim, et al. Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Journal of British Surgery 99(12): p. 1681-1687 (2012).
  14. Bo, T., Y. Peiwu, Q. Feng, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted vs. open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and technical aspects of a case–control study. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 17: p. 1202-1208 (2013).
  15. Huang, K.-H., Y.-T. Lan, W.-L. Fang, et al. Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. PLoS One 9(10): p. e111499 (2014).
  16. Son, T., J.H. Lee, Y.M. Kim, et al. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surgical endoscopy 28: p. 2606-2615 (2014).
  17. Junfeng, Z., S. Yan, T. Bo, et al. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes. Surgical endoscopy 28: p. 1779-1787 (2014).
  18. You, Y.H., Y.M. Kim, and D.H. Ahn Beginner surgeon's initial experience with distal subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using a minimally invasive approach. Journal of gastric cancer 15(4): p. 270-277 (2015).
  19. Suda, K., M. Man-i, Y. Ishida, et al. Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surgical endoscopy 29: p. 673-685 (2015).
  20. Procopiuc, L., S. Tudor, M. Manuc, et al. Open vs robotic radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 12(3): p. 502-508 (2016).
  21. Shen, W., H. Xi, B. Wei, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy 30: p. 574-580 (2016).
  22. Kim, Y.-W., D. Reim, J.Y. Park, et al. Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. Surgical endoscopy 30: p. 1547-1552 (2016).
  23. Wang, G., Z. Jiang, J. Zhao, et al. Assessing the safety and efficacy of full robotic gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot‐sewn anastomosis for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of surgical oncology 113(4): p. 397-404 (2016).
  24. Parisi, A., D. Reim, F. Borghi, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery. World journal of gastroenterology 23(13): p. 2376 (2017).
  25. Ojima, T., M. Nakamura, K. Hayata, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA surgery 156(10): p. 954-963 (2021).
  26. Caruso, S., R. Giudicissi, M. Mariatti, et al. Laparoscopic vs. Open Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Case-Control Study. Current Oncology 29(3): p. 1840-1865 (2022).
  27. Li, Z.-Y., Y.-B. Zhou, T.-Y. Li, et al. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study of 5402 patients in China. Annals of surgery 277(1): p. e87-e95 (2023).
  28. Montorsi, F. A plea for integrating laparoscopy and robotic surgery in everyday urology: the rules of the game. european urology 52(2): p. 307-309 (2007).
  29. Tinelli, A., A. Malvasi, S. Gustapane, et al. Robotic assisted surgery in gynecology: current insights and future perspectives. Recent patents on biotechnology 5(1): p. 12-24 (2011).
  30. Marano, A., F. Priora, L.M. Lenti, et al. Application of fluorescence in robotic general surgery: review of the literature and state of the art. World journal of surgery 37: p. 2800-2811 (2013).
  31. Kang, B.H., Y. Xuan, H. Hur, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: the learning curve of robotic surgery. Journal of gastric cancer 12(3): p. 156-163 (2012).
  32. Woo, Y., W.J. Hyung, K.-H. Pak, et al. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Archives of surgery 146(9): p. 1086-1092 (2011).
  33. Kim, M.-C., G.-U. Heo, and G.-J. Jung Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surgical endoscopy 24: p. 610-615 (2010).
  34. D’Annibale, A., V. Pende, G. Pernazza, et al. Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. Journal of Surgical Research 166(2): p. e113-e120 (2011).
  35. Wu, W.-C., T.S. Smith, W.G. Henderson, et al. Operative blood loss, blood transfusion, and 30-day mortality in older patients after major noncardiac surgery. Annals of surgery 252(1): p. 11-17 (2010).
  36. Vamvakas, E. Perioperative blood transfusion and cancer recurrence: meta‐analysis for explanation. Transfusion 35(9): p. 760-768 (1995).
  37. Fuchs, K. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 34(02): p. 154-159 (2002).
  38. Shehzad, K., K. Mohiuddin, S. Nizami, et al. Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer. Surgical Oncology 16(2): p. 85-98 (2007).
  39. Guerrini, G.P., G. Esposito, P. Magistri, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: the largest meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery 82: p. 210-228 (2020).
  40. Haverkamp, L., T.J. Weijs, P.C. van der Sluis, et al. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy 27: p. 1509-1520 (2013).
  41. Caruso, S., A. Patriti, F. Roviello, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Clinical Oncology 8(3): p. 273 (2017).