Journal Browser
Indexing and Partners

Google scholar

Crossref

Open Access Journal Article

A meta-analysis looking at the effects of continuous management for complications related to intraoperative pressure wound ulcers in women with breast cancer

by Ruei Gu 1  and  Guoemei Xu 2,*
1
Graduate School of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
2
Department of Dematology, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
IJCMR  2024, 31; 2(4), 31; https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr2040001
Received: 29 April 2024 / Accepted: 2 July 2024 / Published Online: 9 July 2024

Abstract

Backgrounds

A meta-analysis research was executed to appraise the effect of the continuous intervention for intraoperative pressure wound ulcers (IOPWUs) associated problems in breast cancer (BC) females.

Methods

Inclusive literature research till March 2023 was done and 436 interconnected researches were revised. The 8 picked researches, enclosed 1267 BC females were in the utilized researches' starting point, 636 of them were utilizing CI, and 631 were control. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to appraise the effect of CI for IOPWUs associated problems in BC females by the dichotomous, or contentious approaches and a fixed or random model.

Results

Continuous intervention had significantly lower IOPWUs (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13-0.24, p<0.001), higher Braden risk score (BRS) (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.91-2.31, p<0.001), and higher quality of life (OR, 9.75; 95% CI, 6.90-12.60, p=0.02) compared to control in BC females.

Conclusions

Continuous intervention had significantly lower IOPWUs, higher BRS, and higher quality of life compared to control in BC females. However, caution must be taken when interacting with its values since there was a low number of nominated research found for some comparison in the meta-analysis.


Copyright: © 2024 by Gu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Gu, R.; Xu, G. A meta-analysis looking at the effects of continuous management for complications related to intraoperative pressure wound ulcers in women with breast cancer. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research, 2024, 2, 31. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr2040001
AMA Style
Gu R, Xu G. A meta-analysis looking at the effects of continuous management for complications related to intraoperative pressure wound ulcers in women with breast cancer. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research; 2024, 2(4):31. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr2040001
Chicago/Turabian Style
Gu, Ruei; Xu, Guoemei 2024. "A meta-analysis looking at the effects of continuous management for complications related to intraoperative pressure wound ulcers in women with breast cancer" International Journal of Clinical Medical Research 2, no.4:31. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr2040001

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Gucalp, A., T.A. Traina, J.R. Eisner, J.S. Parker, S.R. Selitsky, B.H. Park, A.D. Elias, E.S. Baskin-Bey, and F. Cardoso, Male breast cancer: a disease distinct from female breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. 173: p. 37-48.
  2. Xu, X., M. Zhang, F. Xu, and S. Jiang, Wnt signaling in breast cancer: biological mechanisms, challenges and opportunities. Molecular cancer, 2020. 19: p. 1-35.
  3. Liang, Y., H. Zhang, X. Song, and Q. Yang. Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer: Molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. in Seminars in cancer biology. 2020. Elsevier.
  4. Shen, Y., X. Peng, and C. Shen, Identification and validation of immune-related lncRNA prognostic signature for breast cancer. Genomics, 2020. 112(3): p. 2640-2646.
  5. Hahnel, E., M. El Genedy, T. Tomova‐Simitchieva, A. Hauß, A. Stroux, A. Lechner, C. Richter, M. Akdeniz, U. Blume‐Peytavi, and N. Löber, The effectiveness of two silicone dressings for sacral and heel pressure ulcer prevention compared with no dressings in high‐risk intensive care unit patients: a randomized controlled parallel‐group trial. British Journal of Dermatology, 2020. 183(2): p. 256-264.
  6. Du, Y., F. Wu, S. Lu, W. Zheng, H. Wang, R. Chen, X. Lu, and Y. Zhang, Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ open, 2019. 9(4): p. e026727.
  7. Young, C., Using the'aSSKINg'model in pressure ulcer prevention and care planning. Nurs Stand, 2021. 36(2): p. 61-6.
  8. Díaz‐Valenzuela, A., F.P. García‐Fernández, P. Carmona Fernández, M.J. Valle Cañete, and P.L. Pancorbo‐Hidalgo, Effectiveness and safety of olive oil preparation for topical use in pressure ulcer prevention: multicentre, controlled, randomised, and double‐blinded clinical trial. International wound journal, 2019. 16(6): p. 1314-1322.
  9. Taylor, C., K. Mulligan, and C. McGraw, Barriers and enablers to the implementation of evidence‐based practice in pressure ulcer prevention and management in an integrated community care setting: A qualitative study informed by the theoretical domains framework. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2021. 29(3): p. 766-779.
  10. Stroup, D.F., J.A. Berlin, S.C. Morton, I. Olkin, G.D. Williamson, D. Rennie, D. Moher, B.J. Becker, T.A. Sipe, and S.B. Thacker, Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Jama, 2000. 283(15): p. 2008-2012.
  11. Liberati, A., D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P.C. Gøtzsche, J.P. Ioannidis, M. Clarke, P.J. Devereaux, J. Kleijnen, and D. Moher, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2009. 62(10): p. e1-e34.
  12. Saeed, H., M. AbdElrahman, A.K. Aldhalmi, M. Nicola, H. Osama, M.E. Abdelrahim, and M.O. Elgendy, A meta-analysis evaluating the effect of N95 respirators in healthcare and non-healthcare providers on laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection. AL-Mustaqbal Journal of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Sciences, 2023. 1(1).
  13. Saeed, H., A.J.H. Al-Athari, and M.O. Elgendy, Effect of Chinese herbal medicine as an adjunctive technique to standard treatment for people with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis. AL-Mustaqbal Journal of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Sciences, 2023. 1(1).
  14. Aldhalmi, A.K., M. AbdElrahman, and M.E. Abdelrahim, Effect of external application of traditional herbal medicine on burn wound ulcers: A meta-analysis. AL-Mustaqbal Journal of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Sciences, 2023. 1(1).
  15. Gupta, S., G. Rout, A.H. Patel, M. Mahanta, N. Kalra, P. Sahu, R. Sethia, A. Agarwal, G. Ranjan, and S. Kedia, Efficacy of generic oral directly acting agents in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Journal of viral hepatitis, 2018. 25(7): p. 771-778.
  16. Sheikhbahaei, S., T.J. Trahan, J. Xiao, M. Taghipour, E. Mena, R.M. Connolly, and R.M. Subramaniam, FDG-PET/CT and MRI for evaluation of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The oncologist, 2016. 21(8): p. 931-939.
  17. Higgins, J.P., S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, and D.G. Altman, Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj, 2003. 327(7414): p. 557-560.
  18. Zeng, J. and Y. Yang, Study on the effect of continuous nursing on improving the home nursing behavior of caregivers of high-risk elderly patients with pressure ulcer. Journal of Nursing Education, 2015. 30: p. 4-6.
  19. Guan, X., L. Yu, and L. Lu, Application of quality control circle activities in continuous nursing of high-risk patients with pressure ulcer. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2015. 7: p. 5-7.
  20. Hu, B., H. Li, and X. Wei, Study on continuous nursing to reduce the incidence of pressure ulcer in elderly patients with high-risk pressure ulcer. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 2016. 32: p. 1285-8.
  21. Wang, X., Y. Wang, and W. Zou, Evaluation of the application effect of continuous nursing based on wechat public platform in high-risk patients with pressure ulcer. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 2017. 33: p. 5-8.
  22. Cao, P., Effect of continuous nursing intervention on reducing the incidence of pressure ulcer in elderly patients with high-risk pressure ulcer. Electronic Journal of Practical Clinical Nursing, 2017. 2: p. 95-6.
  23. Li, Y., Study on continuous nursing to reduce the incidence of pressure ulcer in elderly patients with high-risk pressure ulcer. China Continuing Medical Education, 2017. 9: p. 2-7.
  24. Chen, Q., J. Xie, and J. Tan, Effect analysis of continuous nursing on prevention and treatment of pressure ulcer among high-risk groups in elderly centers. China Medical Innovation, 2017. 14: p. 4-6.
  25. Liu, N. and J. Wang, Application value of continuous nursing intervention in discharge follow-up of elderly patients with high-risk pressure ulcer. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2019. 16: p. 3-15.
  26. Mäkinen, M., E. Haavisto, V. Lindström, K. Brolin, and M. Castren, Finnish and Swedish prehospital emergency care providers’ knowledge and attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention. International Emergency Nursing, 2021. 55: p. 100873.
  27. Parisod, H., A. Holopainen, E. Kielo‐Viljamaa, P. Puukka, D. Beeckman, and E. Haavisto, Attitudes of nursing staff towards pressure ulcer prevention in primary and specialised health care: A correlational cross‐sectional study. International wound journal, 2022. 19(2): p. 399-410.
  28. Nadukkandiyil, N., S. Syamala, H.A. Saleh, B. Sathian, K. Ahmadi Zadeh, S. Acharath Valappil, M. Alobaidli, S.A. Elsayed, A. Abdelghany, and K. Jayaraman, Implementation of pressure ulcer prevention and management in elderly patients: a retrospective study in tertiary care hospital in Qatar. The Aging Male, 2020. 23(5): p. 1066-1072.
  29. Delawder, J.M., S.L. Leontie, R.S. Maduro, M.K. Morgan, and K.S. Zimbro, Predictive validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden skin risk tools in critical care patients: a multisite project. American Journal of Critical Care, 2021. 30(2): p. 140-144.
  30. Wei, M., L. Wu, Y. Chen, Q. Fu, W. Chen, and D. Yang, Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in critical care: a meta‐analysis. Nursing in critical care, 2020. 25(3): p. 165-170.
  31. Anrys, C., H. Van Tiggelen, S. Verhaeghe, A. Van Hecke, and D. Beeckman, Independent risk factors for pressure ulcer development in a high‐risk nursing home population receiving evidence‐based pressure ulcer prevention: Results from a study in 26 nursing homes in Belgium. International wound journal, 2019. 16(2): p. 325-333.
  32. Reddy, T.P., R.R. Rosato, X. Li, S. Moulder, H. Piwnica-Worms, and J.C. Chang, A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations. Breast Cancer Research, 2020. 22(1): p. 1-11.
  33. Ding, L., S. Ding, C. He, Q. Zhang, and J. An, The efficacy of continuing nursing interventions on intraoperative pressure ulcer-related complications in breast cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surgery, 2022. 11(6): p. 1078-9.
  34. Lozano-Montoya, I., M. Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, I. Abraha, A. Cherubini, R.L. Soiza, D. O'Mahony, B. Montero-Errasquín, A. Correa-Pérez, and A.J. Cruz-Jentoft, Nonpharmacologic interventions to prevent pressure ulcers in older patients: an overview of systematic reviews (the software ENgine for the assessment and optimization of drug and non-drug therapy in older peRsons [SENATOR] definition of optimal evidence-based non-drug therapies in older people [ONTOP] series). Journal of the American Medical